![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
REal COst Reduction of Door-to-door Intermodal Transport | |||||
![]() |
||||||
Further information on the data compilation will be given here as the work progresses.
Task 4.2:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| top | Task 4.1 | Task 4.2 | Task 4.3 |
| The Impact Pathway Approach | |||
| High Level Group on Infrastructure | |||
While the direct emissions from a vehicles use phase contribute to the major fraction of externalities, indirect impacts resulting from e.g. fuel and infrastructure supply are of increasing importance as direct emissions of vehicles, ships, or aircraft are decreasing. Environmental burdens resulting from the steps in life cycle will be quantified based on data available in the literature. As in most cases the emission site is unknown and thus no site specific impact assessment modelling is possible, life cycle emissions will be converted into external costs by using average damage factors in terms of Euro per kg of pollutant, that are derived from EcoSense runs with emission distributions, that reflect the spatial distribution of the considered industrial branch in each country (based on CORINAIR data).
| top | Task 4.1 | Task 4.2 | Task 4.3 |
| The Impact Pathway Approach | |||
| High Level Group on Infrastructure | |||
Most early studies on transport externalities followed a top-down approach, giving average costs rather than marginal costs. But according to economic theory, marginal costs are required as adders to the price of transportation. Moreover, the impacts of transport activities are highly site-specific, as can most obviously be seen for noise: noise emitted in densely populated areas affects many people and thus causes much higher impacts than noise emitted in sparsely populated areas. The starting point for the assessment of marginal damages is the micro level, i.e. the traffic flow on a particular route. The marginal external costs of one additional vehicle are calculated for a single trip. Only a detailed bottom-up approach meets the requirements of quantifying marginal costs considering technology and site specific parameters.
The Impact Pathway Approach developed in the EC funded ExternE Project meets these requirements. Figure 1 illustrates the models used for quantifying impacts due to airborne pollutants. It can be transferred to other impact categories such as noise, accidents etc. For impacts due to airborne emissions the chain of causal relationships starts from the emission of a burden through transport and chemical conversion in the environment to the impacts on various receptors, such as humans, crops, building materials or ecosystems. As far as possible, welfare losses resulting from these impacts are transferred into monetary values. Based on the concepts of welfare economics, monetary valuation follows the approach of willingness-to-pay for improved environmental quality.
It is important to note, that, although marginal costs are estimated, the emissions from all other sources and the background concentration influences the marginal change in concentration and deposition of the primary and secondary pollutants caused by the additional emissions; so all emissions and the resulting concentrations have to be accounted for in the framework.
Figure 1. The Impact Pathway Approach for the quantification of marginal external costs caused by air pollution and noise
The impact pathway methodology has been used in a large number of research projects and policy application related studies. In spite of still significant uncertainties in some areas, the Impact Pathway Approach is widely recognised now as the most reliable tool for environmental impact assessment that - in contrast to other methodologies - allows the estimation of site specific marginal external costs. Appropriate models are available now that support the standardised implementation of the complex impact pathway methodology with a reasonable effort.
| top | Task 4.1 | Task 4.2 | Task 4.3 |
| The Impact Pathway Approach | |||
| High Level Group on Infrastructure | |||
The European Commission convened a High Level Group of transport specialists to examine the extent to which changes in user charging (along the lines proposed in the Commissions Green paper Towards Fair and Efficient Pricing in Transport), might assist in addressing these problems, and how the practical implementation of the recommended changes might best be achieved.
A number of expert advisors were appointed by th High Level Group for consultancy in specific fields of knowledge. Amongst others, Dr Andrea Ricci from ISIS, co-ordinator of the RECORDIT project, and Professor Dr. Rainer Friedrich from IER were responsible for the final report on environmental costs.
| top | Task 4.1 | Task 4.2 | Task 4.3 |
| The Impact Pathway Approach | |||
| High Level Group on Infrastructure | |||
For further information on external costs of transport please contact:
Stephan Schmid
IER - Institute of Energy Economics and the Rational Use of Energy, University of Stuttgart
Hessbruehlstrasse 49a D-70565 Stuttgart
Phone: +49 711 7806155 Fax: +49 711 7803953
|